Disgusting
January 22, 2008
When the adult entertainment business goes here, I really wish someone would sue them. The image above is ZULEIDY’s web page, a porns star who lives here in Spain. I’m shocked that someone -probably a man- encouraged and helped her to build her web with pictures that are presenting her as if she were underaged. Adult Entertainments Industry should care about pleasure, and this practice is in the opposite side: in the edge of a criminal act. I am more open to accept that a woman who looks 25 dresses like a teenager, but I don’t like when women with small bodies, tiny breasts and child aspect play this silly game. It should not be legal, it should be forbidden.
I really agree with your opinion. This is something I hate. I can’t believe how men can like something like this… She seems so young… :(
Comment by Lisy — January 27, 2008 @ 4:07 pm
I understand why you don’t like it, but I don’t think it should be illegal. She is over-age. She should have the right to wear diapers if she likes (of course, that could make her seem old and incontinent).
Comment by Will — January 30, 2008 @ 1:59 pm
You who are willing to promote women as they are refuse a women that’s of small stature, it is very confusing.
I also went to the site to check it out and nowhere is it written “underage” or anything meaning it.
Don’t around saying things that discriminate people just because you prefer a kind of girls to another
Comment by crotte — February 5, 2008 @ 10:26 am
Crotte:
I do not have any problem with small girls or small people, the problem is when the adult industry likes to simulate that the girls are underage.
Erika
Comment by Erika — February 5, 2008 @ 8:33 pm
What if the girls themselves like to simulate that they are underage? “Forbidden” is indeed one quality that people seem most driven to desire. While the adult film industry no doubt bamboozles its fair share of petite women into playing up the underage thing, do you really think that goes for everyone?
Comment by Rex — February 9, 2008 @ 4:03 am
La imagen de niña en la indudtria porno no deb ser utilizada ni por las exhuberantes , ni por las que parecen lolitas.
Comment by Sara — June 2, 2008 @ 7:44 pm
I totally disaggree with your opinion, Erika.
She looks a little bit younger as 25, but not “underage”. And what is “underage” ? 17 or 16 ?
Above you praised the danish book “Generation P”, I only read a summary yet, but from what Ive read, it also covers the topic, that a lot of older Teens, from 14 to a day before their 18th birthday, watch porn and can enjoy it without side-effects.
Until a few years ago, some european countries had a much lower minimum age for porn, 15 in Denmark and 16 in the Netherlands, for example. 15,16,17 year old teens arent children. But the EU now has adapted the US laws. Everbody under 18 is a “child”.
You wrote:”but I don’t like when women with small bodies, tiny breasts and child aspect play this silly game. It should not be legal, it should be forbidden.”
Why should it ? All of these models arent playing with a “child aspect”, but with a “late teen” aspect. The minimum age of 18 is totally outdated. A 17-year old girl is no “child”.
If you even want to forbid porn, because the model only LOOKS younger, you are exactly in the line with the christian right and conservative knuckleheads.
Comment by Caroline-NL — July 26, 2008 @ 5:46 pm
I coudn’t agree more with Caroline-NL.
Indeed, I doble agree!
A teenager of 16, 17 or 18 isn´t a child… and who think so has a problem: in the brain or at the eyes.
There is a general regretion on laws because of fanatics with bad sexuallity problems… GO FREUD! and go home.
Comment by Buddy — November 10, 2008 @ 12:52 pm
Just a few facts (or questions):
She is an adult,
You’re adult(s)
I’m an adult…
…Is she (or anybody like her) hurting someone?
Did she forced you to see her?
Let’s suppose many (probably most) of her “fans” like her ’cause she looks as young. Is it either hurting anybody?
If somebody got forbidden uh, (for example) coffee, but you would like the flavor and could drink something wich tastes like but isn’t would it be wright or would it be wrong?
I’m just triyn’ to say:
You asking for it to be forbidden is really because you think you’re protecting somebody (not her, I can tell it). Or you just want to say other persons what they can and what they cannot watch?
Don’t forget: One person’s rights end where other’s start.
Comment by SamSproter — January 8, 2009 @ 12:41 am